Newt Gingrich on Transhumanism

Tuesday, January 31. 2012

Newt Gingrich on Transhumanism

Many people who read my work elsewhere think transhumanism movement is not an important pro-life issue. It is so abstract an idea to them that they regularly wonder why I bother writing about it. I think it is simply because they don't realize how much transhumanism is already in our consciousness. Artificial human enhancements are depicted everywhere from TV (Chuck) to movies (Captain America and Limitless) to video games (Deus Ex.)

And whether parents realize it or not, transhumansim is especially in the consciousness of our children. In a recent conversation, my own son asked me why I don't like human enhancements. He was distressed and asked, "Then how can I become a super hero?" My husband commented that he wanted to be a super hero too when he was nine and every boy in the world wants to be a super hero. I responded that our son's generation may actually be able to fulfill those childhood and childish "dreams" of becoming enhanced.

This is the first time in history technology may make it possible for people to be able to chase those fantastical "super-hero" dreams of their youth with cognitive enhancing drugs, genetic engineering or artificial intelligence. The problem with childhood fantasies is that children often cannot see the possible devastating effects of drugs or invasive procedures on their otherwise healthy bodies. I fear without bringing transhumanism out of the shadows and into the light for scrutiny, an entire generation may not be equipped with enough insight to resist the overwhelming pressure to enhance simply because everyone else is doing it.

Even if your everyday person is not aware of transhumanism, our leaders are aware, or should be. Transhumanism was even a subject in the Republican Presidential debates. Newt Gingrich was asked by Wolf Blitzer about genetic engineering and human enhancement. Mother Jones reports Gingrich's reply:

"These are at the heart of the next 40 years. And we've got to understand: Somewhere on this planet there will be a dictatorship that uses science in a way that is truly grotesque. And then you're gonna have, for example, a decision to make, if someone can participate in the Olympics who's been genetically engineered. I mean you're gonna have, there's an array of different countries out there, some of which have values so lacking to any of us that you're gonna have these kinds of things."

"This may be the first time in some ways since leaving the Garden of Eden where we have to address the question of what it means to be human. And I think it's also a time to be very aware of the fact the greatest of all sins is hubris, putting yourself before God. And that there is a really great danger posed by scientists and those technicians, who believe that they now have God-like powers. Because it defies the very essence of humans."

Posted by Rebecca Taylor in Transhumanism at 08:42 | Comments (3) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

I'm missing the pro-life connection to trans-humanism. Please help me understand.

#1 PastorG on 2012-02-03 07:29 (Reply)

It'd be nice if you gave some wider context and analysis of this.

So what do you think about Newt's statement? Do you think he gets it right? How do you think the other candidates stand on this issue, and are you comfortable with the general thrust of the Republican primary in this area?

#2 April (Homepage) on 2012-02-06 19:56 (Reply)

Newt understands the underpinnings of tranhumanism. That this is not just about enhancements, but the nature of man. Transhumanism rejects our nature. It assumes that we need upgrading. This rejection of the dignity inherent in humanity, will lead to all sorts of injustice including, but not limited to a society where those that have access or can afford enhancements will naturally rule of those who are unenhanced.

Unfortunately, many people just do not feel this is a pressing issue so who knows how Republicans in general see the issue. I am sure that Santorum understands because of his Catholic faith. Romney, I don't know. Some Mormons embrace transhumanism whole-heartedly so it is anyone's guess.

Newt Gingrich on Transhumanism

Mary Meets Dolly

Tuesday, January 31. 2012

Newt Gingrich on Transhumanism

Home Pages

Follow or Contact me

Quicksearch

Recent Entries

Archives

Blogs of Interest

My ears are burning...

Categories

Blog Rings etc.