Tuesday, September 1. 2009Why this is a "Catholic's" not a "Christian's" guide to biotechnologyTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Another Catholic distinction:
Contraception is a grave sin. This did not used to be a distinctly Catholic principle. All Christian churches throughout 1,900 years of history believed this. Check out the writings of Martin Luther and John Calvin, who condemned contraception as completely incompatible with Christian faith. (see Charles D. Provan's book The Bible and Birth Control.) Christians through all centuries and throughout the world agreed with the teaching against abortion AND contraception that had come down from the Apostles themselves (see the teaching against "pessaries" in the Didache, or The Teaching of the Twelve, one of the very earliest Christian documents.) Christian condemnation of contraception was a given until the Church of England gave conditional approval of it at its Lambeth Conference in 1930, after at least a decade of very intense pressure by the eugenics movement, which was very powerful in the United States and England in the "Progressive Era" of the 1910s and 1920s. A very good concise description of what happened is available at: http://www.envoymagazine.com/backissues/2.5/story2.html
I believe I am the one who was the catalyst for this article. I have a personal distaste for self-declaration by denomination instead of self-declaration as Christian and then providing denomination. I strongly believe there are official members of every denomination who are among God's official list of non-Christians (pardon my trivialized language) and I strongly believe there are official members of every denomination who are true Christians.
My concern was of a "reader-inferred" nature as opposed to a "writer-inferred" one. While I only sporadically read this site, the sites I regularly read frequently have secondary and tertiary links to Catholic sites that don't overtly say "Christian" but very obviously infer it. Those outside Christianity can unintentionally infer an exclusionary meaning. That was my main concern with sites that declare Catholic but don't declare Christian up front. Regarding Kathy's contraception statement, I will agree that I am in disagreement with the Catholic church on that issue. I believe "the marriage bed is undefiled" and if that marriage bed includes contraception, it remains undefiled, so long as the contraception of choice does not actually kill a human. My daughter asked me, 8 years ago when she was 13, "how does the pill work?" I said it prevents the egg from being expelled. If that fails, it prevents the egg from being fertilized. If that fails, it prevents the egg from being implanted in the uterus and sends the egg out. She took that information and said "So the pill aborts the baby?" And I told her she was very perceptive and she was right. I am opposed to the pill because of one of its stages of prevention since abortion is murder. But I am not opposed to fertilization prevention within a marriage, because "the marriage bed is undefiled." |
Follow or Contact me![]() marymeetsdolly [dot] com QuicksearchRecent Entries
ArchivesBlogs of Interest
Warning many of the following blogs are not Catholic or pro-life! My ears are burning..."great title, very informative site/blog" -- Cosmos-Liturgy-Sex "Cool blog! ...I like your honest and smart style..." -- Glenn McGee" "A must for every pro-lifer's bookmarks." -- Fr. Tim Finigan "really worth talking about" -- GOP Soccer Mom "She knows her stuff..." -- Spinal Confusion "a valuable resource" -- Amy Welborn "a must read for any Catholic or Medical Ethicist" -- Tomfoolery of a Seminarian "She's charitable AND loyal to the team. What a gal!" -- Amateur Catholics "For the love of little green apples!" -- Sailorette Categories |